<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Constructive and Classical Mathematics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://conflate.net/inductio/2008/06/constructive-and-classical-mathematics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://conflate.net/inductio/2008/06/constructive-and-classical-mathematics/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Machine Learning and Inference</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 12:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Prediction and the Axiom of Choice &#60; Inductio Ex Machina</title>
		<link>http://conflate.net/inductio/2008/06/constructive-and-classical-mathematics/#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>Prediction and the Axiom of Choice &#60; Inductio Ex Machina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 01:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conflate.net/inductio/?p=42#comment-226</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] the intuitionist in me looks upon this result much as I see the Banach-Tarski paradox. That is, as evidence against [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the intuitionist in me looks upon this result much as I see the Banach-Tarski paradox. That is, as evidence against [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Reid</title>
		<link>http://conflate.net/inductio/2008/06/constructive-and-classical-mathematics/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Reid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 00:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conflate.net/inductio/?p=42#comment-222</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Andrej Bauer has an &lt;a href="http://math.andrej.com/2008/08/13/intuitionistic-mathematics-for-physics/" rel="nofollow"&gt;excellent post&lt;/a&gt; on the use of intuitionistic mathematics in physics with links to its implications for infinitesimals and physics.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrej Bauer has an <a href="http://math.andrej.com/2008/08/13/intuitionistic-mathematics-for-physics/" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/math.andrej.com');">excellent post</a> on the use of intuitionistic mathematics in physics with links to its implications for infinitesimals and physics.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Lemire</title>
		<link>http://conflate.net/inductio/2008/06/constructive-and-classical-mathematics/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Lemire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conflate.net/inductio/?p=42#comment-126</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Assuming we live in a Turing Machine, which is entirely possible, then who cares about anything that is not computable?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That is the value of experimental work and receiving feedback. We assume there is such a thing as a discontinuous function. That's a nice model. But does it match anything we can experience?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Assuming we live in a Turing Machine, which is entirely possible, then who cares about anything that is not computable?</p>

<p>That is the value of experimental work and receiving feedback. We assume there is such a thing as a discontinuous function. That&#8217;s a nice model. But does it match anything we can experience?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
